Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

3,098 characters extracted

—

This document is a document filed in a mock court in the State of Ridgeway on Roblox.com. I am a notary public of the State of Texas in real life. A notary public cannot give legal advice or accept fees for legal advice. See Tex. Gov't Code § 406.017. This document does not constitute legal advice in any way, shape, or form. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY CABNET912, Plaintiff, v. DRACONICLAW, Defendant. No. RSC-CV-651 COMPLAINT cabnet912, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby brings this civil action and alleges as follows– INTRODUCTION 1. On August 27th, 2022, Plaintiff cabnet912 was driving along the highway when he was eventually killed by a group of people including Defendant DraconicLaw.1 2. After Cabnet died, Draconic shot at his green truck, attempting to damage it. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section IV of the Constitution of the State of Ridgeway. 4. Venue is proper in this Court because the incident took place within Ridgeway County. PARTIES 5. Plaintiff cabnet912 is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. 6. Defendant DraconicLaw is a resident of the State of Ridgeway. CAUSE OF ACTION (Trespass to Chattels) 7. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in all preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 1 Cabnet cannot prove upon a preponderance of the evidence that Draconic and the other people with them indeed killed them. Cabnet is simply setting the scene for the Court. COMPLAINT - 1 - DorkJacob Law 1B Palm View Palmer, Ridgeway This document is a document filed in a mock court in the State of Ridgeway on Roblox.com. I am a notary public of the State of Texas in real life. A notary public cannot give legal advice or accept fees for legal advice. See Tex. Gov't Code § 406.017. This document does not constitute legal advice in any way, shape, or form. 8. “‘The essential elements of trespass to chattels are (1) intent, (2) physical interference with (3) possession, [and] (4) resulting in harm.’” DeAngelis v. Corzine, 17 F. Supp. 3d 270, 283 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (citing Chevron Corp. v. Donziger, 871 F.Supp.2d 229, 258 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)). 9. Draconic intentionally interfered with Cabnet’s possession of their vehicle by shooting at it, and it resulted in harm as his vehicle more likely than not suffered damage as a result. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, Plaintiff prays that the Court– a. Declare that Defendant interfered with Plaintiff’s possession of their vehicle by shooting at it; b. Declare that such shooting resulted in harm; c. Award Plaintiff actual and punitive damages; d. Order Defendant to apologize for their conduct; e. Award Plaintiff attorneys’ fees; f. Award such other, further, or different relief as may be just and proper. Respectfully submitted. Dated: September 2nd, 2022 Palmer, Ridgeway /s/ DorkJacob ——————————————————————————— DORKJACOB Ridgeway Bar No. 17135 Counsel of Record DorkJacob Law 1B Palm View Palmer, Ridgeway JacobInAustin#0001 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff COMPLAINT - 2 - DorkJacob Law 1B Palm View Palmer, Ridgeway

Complaint.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record