ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
State of Ridgeway
IN RE
maaIvin
Respondent
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REPORT
REPORT ON ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
HEARING SUMMARY
Agency: Palmer Police Department
Presiding Judge: Justice siteowner
Dept. Command: Deputy Chief MaximusGXL
Impaneled Officers: MrS3G
Root Entry
Date: Tuesday, August 2nd, 2022
Time 6:30 PM EST
SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS
Please put the name of the offense, its citation, the source of the offense (in Ridgeway State
Register Format, if possible) and the penalties for such offense
OFFENSE NAME OFFENSE CITATION OFFENSE SRC PENALTY
ON-DUTY
STANDARDS (x2)
PPD SOP. §205.2
Bullet points 1, 2, 4, and 5.
PPD STANDARD
OPERATING
PROCEDURE
DHD; UP TO 4
MONTHS
EQUIPMENT
OVERVIEW
PPD SOP. §203.1 PPD STANDARD
OPERATING
PROCEDURE
DHD; UP TO 4
MONTHS
DISCIPLINARY
PROCEDURES
PPD SOP. §501.4 PPD STANDARD
OPERATING
PROCEDURE
DHD; UP TO 4
MONTHS
FINDINGS OF FACT
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE IMPANELED OFFICERS)
1) Respondent Maalvin failed to maintain his equipment securely.
2) Respondent Maalvin failed to maintain a professional outlook.
3) Respondent Maalvin failed to show respect to those serving within the community.
4) Respondent Maalvin INTENTIONALLY failed to maintain his equipment securely.
5) Respondent Maalvin RECKLESSLY/NEGLIGENTLY failed to maintain a professional
outlook.
6) Respondent Maalvin INTENTIONALLY failed to show respect to those serving within
the community.
FINDINGS OF LAW AND POLICY
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGE)
1) The respondent has raised a "lack of evidence" defense. This means that their argument is
that the evidence provided is insufficient to make a decision. There is no direct standard
of proof set by law, however, there is a standard of reasonability required in these
proceedings. This means that after you view the evidence and you reasonably think that
the respondent is guilty of what he is accused of, then you may vote to enter into the
punitive phase.
2) A person acts recklessly, or is reckless, with respect to circumstances surrounding his
conduct or the result of his conduct when he is aware of but consciously disregards a
substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The
risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation
from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the
circumstances as viewed from the actor's standpoint.
3) A person acts intentionally, or with intent, with respect to the nature of his conduct or to a
result of his conduct when it is his conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct
or cause the result.
4) In order to dishonorably discharge you must find that the conduct was:
a) A finding of wanton disregard for policy, statute, or regulation
b) or, A finding of an intentional act.
5) You can issue a general discharge if you find that the conduct was:
a) That wrongdoing was in the form of negligence or recklessness.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Tribunal enters a recommendation that the respondent be dishonorably discharged.
CERTIFICATION
We, the tribunal, duly impaneled, do hereby certify the findings of this hearing, and have
forthwith put our recommendations as part of this report. These findings are findings of our own,
and purely our own without any outside interference or coercion. We make this recommendation
in good faith, under pains and penalties of perjury, and that it is not the result of bias, prejudice,
or other unlawful influence on our own judgment.
/s/ MrS3G
IMPANELED OFFICER ONE
/s/ RootEntry
IMPANELED OFFICER TWO
/s/ siteowner
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
A) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IRPjJ7Jl12nZ4ABH_FR4RxTSMzzLwNWc/view?usp=s
haring
B) https://youtu.be/_yrMzjAcHAo
C) https://youtu.be/4Vlnh929kLE
