Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
3,487 characters extracted
—
ADM F. 500 (Rev. 03/22) Order and Judgment
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CM-426
Plaintiff
v.
MASTERCH8SE
Defendant
BACKGROUND
On the 6th of June 2022 the Ridgeway Justice Department filed an information alleging violations of 3
R.C.C § 10 on three counts, 7 R.C.C § 13 on one count, 5 R.C.C § 05 on one count, 7 R.C.C § 22 on one count,
and 6 R.C.C § 04 on one count. The defendant appeared, however left the Superior Court Discord, therefore the
matter proceeded in absentia.
JUDGMENT
The government admits sufficient evidence and witness testimony to grant this court a firm conviction
that the defendant is guilty on charges one through three. The defense argues against charges two and three that
the government has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant fired the fatal shots onto the
complainant. The court rejects this argument. If the government can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a
defendant struck a person with any non-zero number of bullets, and that person died shortly thereafter (which
the government has, in this case), that defendant is guilty of murder.
The defense argues against count four by postulating that the government has not proven the identity of
the driver who drove their vehicle in-front of the transit bus causing the driver of that bus to be hindered
through an interference. The video evidence, state’s Exhibit D, shows the defendant’s username-tag as they exit
this particular vehicle, therefore this court finds the defendant guilty on count four.
The government has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the locations of any of these shootings
were within city limits or a residential area, therefore this court must acquit the defendant on count five.
The defense argues against count six by postulating that intent has not been proven. State’s Exhibit C is
more than clearly depicts the defendant striking another with the vehicle they were operating. This court is
firmly satisfied that this act was committed intentionally, based on what is depicted in evidence and witness
testimony, therefore this court finds the defendant guilty on count six.
The defense argues against count seven by postulating, once again, that intent has not been proven. The
defense argues that this court must find that the defendant aided in a crime and knew that they were aiding in a
crime. This court is firmly convinced that, when examining all evidence cumulatively, the defendant knowingly
facilitated two murders through their driving of the passenger of their vehicle to the location of these two
crimes, therefore this court finds the defendant guilty on count seven.
CONCLUSION
For the aforementioned stated reasons, this court finds the defendant;
- GUILTY ON COUNT ONE OF THE INFORMATION - 3 R.C.C § 10 - SECOND-DEGREE
MURDER
- GUILTY ON COUNT TWO OF THE INFORMATION - 3 R.C.C § 10 - SECOND-DEGREE
MURDER
- GUILTY ON COUNT THREE OF THE INFORMATION - 3 R.C.C § 10 - SECOND-DEGREE
MURDER
- GUILTY ON COUNT FOUR OF THE INFORMATION - 7 R.C.C § 13 - INTERFERING
WITH DRIVER’S CONTROL OF VEHICLE
- NOT GUILTY ON COUNT FIVE OF THE INFORMATION - 5 R.C.C § 05 - UNLAWFUL
DISCHARGE OF A FIREARM
- GUILTY ON COUNT SIX OF THE INFORMATION - 7 R.C.C § 22 - VEHICULAR
ASSAULT
- GUILTY ON COUNT SEVEN OF THE INFORMATION - 6 R.C.C § 04 - AIDING AND
ABETTING
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.
At Palmer, Ridgeway, this 10th day of August, 2022.
/s/ Hecxtro
SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
Document record
File size
98.0 KB
Uploaded
Jun 5, 2022 12:00 PM
Filed
Jun 5, 2022 12:00 PM
Filing code
CRIMINAL_COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
state of ridgeway
Notes
Ruling_RSC-CM-426_2229-081022.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/yq7ImqHz)
