ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
State of Ridgeway
IN RE
Peanut7569
Respondent
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REPORT
REPORT ON ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
HEARING SUMMARY
Agency: Palmer Police Department
Presiding Judge: Judge Eagleeye785
Dept. Command: Captain MrS3G
Impaneled Officers: AhmadKapalot
Da_Beastlyman
Date: [Date]
Time 29/05/2022
SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS
Please put the name of the offense, its citation, the source of the offense (in Ridgeway State
Register Format, if possible) and the penalties for such offense
OFFENSE NAME OFFENSE CITATION OFFENSE SRC PENALTY
Formal Warning 501.1 DEPT POLICY TERMINATION
DISHONORABLE
DISCHARGE
Activity Warning (x3) 301.1 DEPT POLICY TERMINATION
FINDINGS OF FACT
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE IMPANELED OFFICERS)
1) On March 22, 2022, Ridgeway Palmer Police High Command placed Peanut7569 on
administrative leave awaiting termination for failing to fulfil the three-week patrol duty.
2) Displayed in an exhibition A, the weekly patrol quote for 24/4 - ⅕ was not completed by
Officer Peanut7569.
3) Officer Peanut7569 failed to complete the weekly patrol quotation from 5/8/22 to
5/14/22, as seen in exhibition B. This was the second strike for not finishing the patrol
quotes.
4) As shown in exhibit C, officer Peanut 7569 failed to complete the weekly patrol quotation
for the dates of May 15 and May 21. It was his third strike for not finishing the patrol
quotes.
5) Officer Peanut7569, was shown in exhibit D, has three strikes against him, resulting in a
pending termination.
FINDINGS OF LAW AND POLICY
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGE)
1) If the tribunal, or the court through the aforementioned pleading of facts, finds a wanton
disregard for policy (in regards to departmental activity policy), then the tribunal shall be
permmitted to recommend a punishment. If no finding of wanton disregard is found then
the petitioner shall be fully and forever exonerated with no punishment.
2) It is a violation of Palmer Police Department policy to fail to complete the required
activity logs.
3) If the tribunal finds that the subject notified the department of a leave of absence for
atleast one patrol week in which they were striked, then they shall be exonerated from
termination. (NOTE: THEY WAIVERED PRESENCE SO ALL FACTS ARE
ASSUMED TO BE FACTUAL, RATHER THAN SUCH BE PROVEN.)
4) If the tribunal finds that the subject conducted such intentionally, or by negligence, then
Administrative Procedures Act 1.3 (b)(i) shall be justified and the tribunal may
recommend relevant punishment for the subject of this administrative hearing.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Dishonorable discharge of the individual from Palmer Police Department.
2) Termination of the individual from Palmer Police Department.
CERTIFICATION
We, the tribunal, duly impaneled, do hereby certify the findings of this hearing, and have
forthwith put our recommendations as part of this report. These findings are findings of our own,
and purely our own without any outside interference or coercion. We make this recommendation
in good faith, under pains and penalties of perjury, and that it is not the result of bias, prejudice,
or other unlawful influence on our own judgment.
/s/ AhmadKapalot
IMPANELED OFFICER ONE
/s/ Da_Beastlyman
IMPANELED OFFICER TWO
/s/ Eagleeye785
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
A) https://gyazo.com/5f4b105f53d3a829c3cf9c1c2a4f9a85
B) https://gyazo.com/40ed2206edfa71b3b941da5c25973e2c
C) https://gyazo.com/8bb7d4945839839b903b90943bc67e44
D) https://gyazo.com/70d834bc0977f404bf861c8b9117c07d
