Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
3,361 characters extracted
—
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
State of Ridgeway
IN RE
falcon_2s
Respondent
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REPORT
REPORT ON ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
HEARING SUMMARY
Agency: Palmer Police Department
Presiding Judge: Eagleeye785
Dept. Command: Captain MrS3G
Impaneled Officers: Lieutenant AhmadKapalot
Sergeant Da_BeastlyMan
Date: 06/03/22
Time 01:55AM BST
SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS
OFFENSE NAME OFFENSE CITATION OFFENSE SRC PENALTY
Formal Warning 501.7 DEPT POLICY TERMINATION
DISHONOURABLE
DISCHARGE
Activity Policy (x3) 301.1 DEPT POLICY TERMINATION
FINDINGS OF FACT
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE IMPANELED OFFICERS)
1) On Marh 22, 2022, Palmer Police Department High Command placed falcon_2s on
administrative leave awaiting termination for failing to fulfil the three-week patrol duty.
2) Displayed in an Exhibit A, the weekly patrol quote for 24/4 - 1/5 was not completed.
3) Officer Falcon_2s failed to complete the weekly patrol quotation for 5/8/22 to 5/14/22, as
seen in Exhibit B. This was the second strike for not finishing the patrol quotes.
4) As shown in Exhibit C, Officer Falcon_2s failed to complete the patrol quota for the
week of May 15 to May 21. A third strike was issued for not finishing the patrol quotes.
5) Officer Falcon_2s, as shown in exhibit D, has three strikes against him, resulting in a
pending termination.
FINDINGS OF LAW AND POLICY
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGE)
1) If the tribunal, or the court through the aforementioned pleading of facts, finds a wanton
disregard for policy (in regards to departmental activity policy), then the tribunal shall be
permitted to recommend a punishment. If no finding of wanton disregard is found then
the petitioner shall be fully and forever exonerated with no punishment.
2) It is a violation of Departmental policy to not complete the required patrol quota. logs.
3) It is a violation of Departmental policy to accumulate three strikes on the service record.
4) If the tribunal finds that the subject notified the department of a leave of absence for
atleast one patrol week in which they were striked, then they shall be exonerated from
termination.
5) If the tribunal finds that the subject conducted such intentionally, or by negligence, then
Administrative Procedures Act 1.3 (b)(i) shall be justified and the tribunal may
recommend relevant punishment for the subject of this administrative hearing.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Dishonorable discharge of the petitioner from Palmer Police Department.
2) Termination of the individual from Palmer Police Department.
CERTIFICATION
We, the tribunal, duly impaneled, do hereby certify the findings of this hearing, and have
forthwith put our recommendations as part of this report. These findings are findings of our own,
and purely our own without any outside interference or coercion. We make this recommendation
in good faith, under pains and penalties of perjury, and that it is not the result of bias, prejudice,
or other unlawful influence on our own judgment.
/s/ AhmadKapalot
IMPANELED OFFICER ONE
/s/ Da_Beastlyman
IMPANELED OFFICER TWO
/s/ Eagleeye785
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
A) https://gyazo.com/ce570aabeacab3b2da28ca7e4dd589ca
B) https://gyazo.com/7a4d794ec5acf2d482477c2d0a5d76de
C) https://gyazo.com/5adbc33ca145679d1c3abfa012708cf3
D) https://gyazo.com/2731f3208b26ead63fbf566598a38705
Document record
File size
44.2 KB
Uploaded
May 22, 2022 12:00 PM
Filed
May 22, 2022 12:00 PM
Filing code
ADMINISTRATIVE_APPLICATION
Uploaded by
falcon2s
Notes
Ruling_RSC-AH-384_2102-060222.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/3z3toz6J)
