Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

3,367 characters extracted

—

ADMINISTRATIVE COURT State of Ridgeway IN RE insertreality Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING REPORT REPORT ON ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING HEARING SUMMARY Agency: Palmer Police Department Presiding Judge: Eagleeye785 Dept. Command: Captain MrS3G Impaneled Officers: Lieutenant AhmadKapalot Sergeant Da_BeastlyMan Date: 29/05/2022 Time 02:36 BST SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS OFFENSE NAME OFFENSE CITATION OFFENSE SRC PENALTY Formal Warning 501.7 DEPT POLICY TERMINATION DISHONOURABLE DISCHARGE Activity Policy (x3) 301.1 DEPT POLICY TERMINATION FINDINGS OF FACT (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE IMPANELED OFFICERS) 1) The Ridgeway Palmer Police High Command placed insertreality on administrative leave awaiting termination on March 22, 2022, for failing to complete the patrol quote for three weeks. 2) Displayed in an exhibition A: The weekly placed quote for 2022-04-09 was not completed by a former officer insertreality. 3) The former officer insertreality is shown in exhibit B as failing to fulfil the weekly patrol quot of 2022-04-16. 4) The former officer insertreality is shown in exhibit C as completing (1) 30 minute log but failed to complete one more 30 minute log as he must complete (2) 30 minute logs. 5) As shown in Exhibit D, the former officer has received three strikes, resulting in a pending termination. FINDINGS OF LAW AND POLICY (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGE) 1) If the tribunal, or the court through the aforementioned pleading of facts, finds a wanton disregard for policy (in regards to departmental activity policy), then the tribunal shall be permmitted to recommend a punishment. If no finding of wanton disregard is found then the petitioner shall be fully and forever exonerated with no punishment. 2) It is a violation of Ridgeway Parks Service policy to fail to complete the required activity logs. 3) If the tribunal finds that the subject notified the department of a leave of absence for atleast one patrol week in which they were striked, then they shall be exonerated from termination. (NOTE: THEY WAIVERED PRESENCE SO ALL FACTS ARE ASSUMED TO BE FACTUAL, RATHER THAN SUCH BE PROVEN.) 4) If the tribunal finds that the subject conducted such intentionally, or by negligence, then Administrative Procedures Act 1.3 (b)(i) shall be justified and the tribunal may recommend relevant punishment for the subject of this administrative hearing. RECOMMENDATIONS 1) Dishonorable discharge of the petitioner from Palmer Police Department. 2) Termination of the individual from Palmer Police Department. CERTIFICATION We, the tribunal, duly impaneled, do hereby certify the findings of this hearing, and have forthwith put our recommendations as part of this report. These findings are findings of our own, and purely our own without any outside interference or coercion. We make this recommendation in good faith, under pains and penalties of perjury, and that it is not the result of bias, prejudice, or other unlawful influence on our own judgment. /s/ AhmadKapalot IMPANELED OFFICER ONE /s/ Da_Beastlyman IMPANELED OFFICER TWO /s/ Eagleeye785 ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGE APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE A) https://gyazo.com/bfc08cbd8e07d1429a6ed172fdbb62ac B) https://gyazo.com/03833b476b7c692278e82513cfc1121a C) https://gyazo.com/bc40dc5bacdeeb0b41d2d952f2ad6fc1 D) https://gyazo.com/68b86c243659427a1ad43f50a88c474e

Ruling_RSC-AH-382_2136-052822.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record