STATE OF RIDGEWAY
Tomskipetski5
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-380
Plaintiff
v.
StudsPerSeconds
Defendant
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Tomskipetski5 brings this civil action against Defendant StudsPerSeconds, as a result of the facts
that follow.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. Last weekend I sent a complaint to SPS Office of Risk management about zac2524 and
Ahmadkapalot's toxic behaviour.
2. I was then contacted by investigator Akogie on the 17th who asked me multiple
requestions.
3. After the questioning they concluded that they in fact violated policy resulting in
administrative sanction both of them got a verbal warning and zac was also requested to
write an apology letter to me.
4. After the investigator contacted them with the investigation outcome, they decided to
both resign on the spot.
5. SPS has a duty of care toward their employee as it’s clearly written in the handbook
where they praise themselves with superior ethics.
6. But they failed to uphold their handbook which in this scenario is the contract that all
employees abide by.
7. They violated the contract as they allowed zac2524 to resign while he still had to submit
an apology letter to me.
8. SPS Could have placed him on admin leave to avoid him leaving to avoid administrative
sanctions as I told Sandykay49 in dms.
9. Instead SPS placed me on administrative leave for sharing the investigation report which
nowhere on it states that it was under NDA nor did the investigator sending me they told
me it was under a non-disclosure agreement.
10. As such they show that they have double standards, for simple employees trying to get
SPS Internal affairs to do the right thing you get suspended for speaking out but leaving
to avoid sanctions you don't.
ALLEGATIONS
The tort of Breach of Contract (5 R. Stat. § 207) is defined as “Any individual who breaches a
contract they have signed with another party shall be breach of contract and is liable for compensatory
damage, injunctive relief, and punitive damage. If the breaching party is an organization then they shall
be liable for compensatory damages, injunctive relief, and punitive damages (...) ”. The defendant in this
matter knowingly and intentionally violated the handbook the contract that all employees must follow
while being employed in SPS. Defendant did this intentionally even after I warned them by allowing an
employee to resign to avoid administrative sanction thus entitling him to up compensation.
The tort of Civil Conspiracy (5 R. Stat. § 211) is defined as “Any individual who conspires or
colludes between one or more parties to deprive a third party of legal rights or deceive a third party to
obtain an illegal objective shall be a conspiracy and liable for compensatory damages for each offending
party, injunctive relief and $3,000 in punitive damages for each offending party.” In this instance, SPS
Command conspired to deceive me of my legal rights which is to publically denounce their misconduct
by publishing the SPS report which wasn’t even under a non-disclosure agreement to begin with. As I
said previously I had warned them that what I did was perfectly legal but they kept me on suspension
anyway.
The tort of Negligence per se (5 R. Stat. § 206) is defined as “Any individual who has
prescribed a duty by statute or administrative policy, and that individual breached such state or
administrative policy resulted in injury against another individual is negligence per se, and is liable for
compensatory damage and punitive damage up to $3,000.” In this instance, iMickeyL and SPS
leadership had a duty of care toward me as is proscribed within the handbook per policy. Instead, SPS let
zac2524 resign and get away from administrative sanction even after I warned them that they had a duty
of care. Instead of finding another solution to compensate for zac2524 actions, they decided to suspend
me when I denounced them.
The tort of Negligence (5 R. Stat. § 205) is defined as “Any individual who owns a duty of care
to another individual, and that other individual suffers injury as a result of a breach of that duty to care is
negligence and shall be liable for compensatory damages and punitive damages up to $2,500..” In this
instance, iMickeyL and SPS Command had a duty of care toward me as one of their employee they
cannot allow harassment be left unpunished in the workplace. Instead, they punished me when I spoke
out about what happened and shared the administrative report which as I said multiple times wasn’t even
on a non-disclosure agreement. They did it knowingly and with intent, as I had warned them multiple
times that they had a duty of care toward me and the response I got from iMickeyL was anything but
supportive.
The tort of Tortious interference (5 R. Stat. § 210) is defined as “Any individual who damages
another's business ab relationships, contract, or career with a third party causing economic and career
harm is tortious interference and liable for compensatory damages and punitive damages up to $3,000..”
In this instance, iMickeyL and SPS leadership suspended me causing me career damages in other
departments such as Park Service where they decided earlier today to remove me from my acting
position.
JURISDICTION
1. The jurisdiction of the Court originates from Art. V, Sec. IV which states “There shall be a
Superior court which shall exercise original jurisdiction for all civil and criminal cases or
controversies…”
TORTS
1. Plaintiff prays the Court to find Defendant liable for the tortious action of Breach of Contract,
see 5 R. Stat. Sec. 207
a. The defendant knowingly and with intent breached the contract which is the handbook of the
SPS which all employees must abide by.
2. Plaintiff prays the Court to find Defendant liable for the tortious action of Civil Conspiracy, see
5 R. Stat. Sec. 211
a. The defendant knowingly and with intent suspended me for sharing a document that wasn’t
protected by the non-disclosure agreement which is illegal as did it to denounce the inaction of
SPS and thus is retaliation.
3. Plaintiff prays the Court to find Defendant liable for the tortious action of Negligence per se, see
5 R. Stat. Sec. 206
a. iMickeyL both knowingly and with intent knew that he had a duty of care toward me as SPS
head of the office of risk management. He allowed an employee to resign after he had harassed
me and had administrative sanction that he had to uphold.
4. Plaintiff prays the Court to find Defendant liable for the tortious action of Negligence, see 5 R.
Stat. Sec. 205
a. iMickeyL both knowingly and with intent knew that he had a duty of care toward me as SPS
head of the office of risk management. iMickeyL allowed those employees to personally attack
me and even did so himself in personal discord messages when I was attempting to reason with
him.
5. Plaintiff prays the Court to find Defendant liable for the tortious action of Tortious interference
, see 5 R. Stat. Sec. 10
a. iMickeyL and SPS leadership with intent and knowingly placed me on administrative leave
causing other departments where I work into such as Parks Service to reconsider my promotion
earlier today.
PRAYERS FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiff requests that the relief for Breach of Contract be $3,000 in compensatory damages.
2. The Plaintiff requests that the relief for Civil Conspiracy be $3000 in punitive damages.
3. The Plaintiff requests that the relief for Negligence per se be $3000 in compensatory damages.
4. The Plaintiff requests that the relief for Negligence be a $2500 in compensatory damages.
5. The Plaintiff requests that the relief for Tortious interference be $3000 in compensatory damages
6. Plaintiff also seeks any additional relief as deemed appropriate by the Court that is not requested
herein.
Date: 21st of May
Respectfully Submitted,
Plaintiffs Tomskipetski5
/s/ Tomskipetski5
Tomskipetski5, RSB#17142
