STATE OF RIDGEWAY
DorkJacob
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-362
Plaintiff
v.
guestbigstupid-et-al
Defendant
RESPONSE TO CIVIL COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT PARTIES
1. guestbigstupid, nastysiege, and thewolf778 are citizens of the State of Ridgeway who are
defendants in this case.
2. aSmoothCriminal is a tourist to the State of Ridgeway who is a defendant in this case.
PLEAS
1. Wrongful Death (x1 for all defendants), 1 R. Stat. § 209 - All Defendants plea NOT LIABLE
DEFENDANT’S AVERMENTS
1. guestbigstupid is not liable for the tort of wrongful death (1 R. Stat. § 209) because the
Defendant is protected by Rid. Vehicular Assault Act (2022) and did not cause the death of the
plaintiff under 1 R. Stat. § 209.
2. nastysiege is not liable for the tort of wrongful death (1 R. Stat. § 209) because the Defendant
was not aware that guestbigstupid, who was being fired upon by the plaintiff, was
commissioning a crime while in the act of self-defense under Rid. Good Samaritan Act (2022).
3. aSmoothCriminal is not liable for the tort of wrongful death (1 R. Stat. § 209) because the
Defendant did not cause the death of the plaintiff under 1 R. Stat. § 209.
4. thewolf778 is not liable for the tort of wrongful death (1 R. Stat. § 209) because the Defendant
did not cause the death of the plaintiff under 1 R. Stat. § 209.
AFFIRMATIONS AND DENIALS OF THE PLAINTIFF’S AVERMENTS
1. We disagree with the first point under the plaintiff’s civil complaint under introduction. The
plaintiff was initially following the ghost-grey Lancasters (seated by the defendants) before the
Lancaster began following them (see 1:29:40-1:30:27 of evidence submitted by Plaintiff)
2. We agree with the second point under the plaintiff’s civil complaint under introduction.
3. We disagree with the third point under the plaintiff’s civil complaint under introduction. There is
only one defendant, guestbigstupid, that got out of the vehicle and was breaking the windows of
the plaintiff. No shots are heard as there is no audio in the evidence and the defendant,
guestbigstupid, was clearly seen using a crowbar to break the windows, not a firearm.
4. We disagree with the fourth point under the plaintiff’s civil complaint under introduction.
aSmoothCriminal and thewolf778 did not make an attempt to fire or strike upon the plaintiff, and
there is no evidence suggesting they aided in the tort. guestbigstupid injured the plaintiff in an act
of self-defense while nastysiege was the defendant who killed the plaintiff to defend the
defendant as he had only observed the firefight that was taking place outside the residency where
the tort took place.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. The plaintiff initially began following a ghost-grey Lancaster seating the defendants before they
made a U-Turn and followed the plaintiff to his home.
2. The ghost-grey Lancaster drops off defendant guestbigstupid where he proceeds to break the
windows of the house.
3. Under Section 2(i) of the Rid. Vehicular Assault Act (2022), “Lethal force may only be exercised
if the individual is actively assaulting/attempting to assault the victim.” Most of the house
windows were barricaded and the door was locked. The window that was unbarricaded was
struck by defendant guestbigstupid. If he were to have the intent to assault or kill the plaintiff, he
could have shot through said window, but didn’t.
4. The plaintiff fired the first shot indoors, went outside, and began firing upon guestbigstupid
where he returned fire in self-defense under Section 2(i) aforementioned as the plaintiff began
the engagement with the defendant.
5. aSmoothCriminal and nastysiege appear where nastysiege, who saw the defendant,
guestbigstupid being engaged upon by the plaintiff, decided to engage with the plaintiff but had
no previous knowledge that the defendant, guestbigstupid, was engaged in the commission of a
crime under Section 3(iii) of the Rid. Good Samaritan Act (2022). aSmoothCriminal had not
committed any observable illegal action during this period and did not participate in the death of
the plaintiff.
6. Thewolf778 appears from a nearby home and walks over to the crime scene, having no
participation in the death of the plaintiff whatsoever.
Respectfully Submitted,
Plaintiffs guestbigstupid-et-al
By their Attorneys,
/s/ epicdino36023
epicdino36023, RSB#17117
