Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

2,825 characters extracted

—

DorkJacob ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━ 5 Cyrus Acres, Milton, Ridgeway JacobInAustin#0001 [email protected] May 3rd, 2022 The Honorable Eagleeye785 Judge Superior Court of the State of Ridgeway One Jackson Street Palmer, Ridgeway Re: Hitherwguys v. Khazain, No. RSC-CV-332 (2022) To whom it may concern, I am DorkJacob, and I was privately retained by Defendant Khazain in the above-entitled action to give legal advice to them about their rights in the above-entitled action. I have also been retained by Mr. Khazain to represent him in Khazain v. Clifford2, No. RSC-CV-360 (2022), which is claim for administrative review to challenge the Attorney General’s unlawful award of monetary damages in the Hitherwguys action. I write to address the legal advice that I have given to Mr. Khazain in order to avoid the appearance of impropriety and to assure the Court that me and my client are strictly following the law and the Rules of Professional Conduct. I have advised Mr. Khazain to not pay the fine/award of $3,000 in the Hitherwguys action pending the outcome of the Clifford2 action, which I believe will result in either a temporary restraining order (TRO) or preliminary injunction will be issued by the Clifford2 Court. In my legal opinion, there is more than enough grounds for the issuance of a TRO or preliminary injunction. If the Clifford2 Court does not act by tomorrow, May 14th, 2022 at 8:00 PM Central Time, my client intends to request that the Supreme Court issue temporary injunctive relief to allow the Clifford2 Court time to make a well-informed and - 1 - balanced decision on either a TRO or our current Renewed Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. We anticipate that the Supreme Court will act swiftly on our application if we have to go that route. If the Supreme Court denies relief, we are prepared to pay the $3,000 as the Court directs1 and will use the Clifford2 action as a vehicle to sue Hitherwguys for that money back, but we will respectfully request that the Court keep the Hitherwguys action active to protect my client’s rights to challenge the award.2 Please let me know if you have any questions. Dated: May 13th, 2022 Palmer, Ridgeway Yours, etc., /s/ DorkJacob ——————————————————————————— DORKJACOB Ridgeway Bar No. 17135 2 As expressed in the Clifford2 action, the challenge to the award is not based on the merits, as that is otherwise unappealable. The challenge to the award is based on the unlawful award of monetary damages, and seeing as the meditation award was issued by the Attorney General, that is “agency action” within the meaning of the Administrative Review Statute. 1 My client would appreciate clear and binding instructions from the Court on how to pay the award as there has been conflicting information from the Court and counsel for Hitherwguys. - 2 -

Letter_to_Judge_re_Award.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record