STATE OF RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
Hitherwguys
Plaintiff,
v.
Khazain
Defendant.
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Docket No. RSC-CV-332
PARTIES
1. Mr. Hitherwguys, the Plaintiff, is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Mr. Khazain, the Defendant, in his official capacity as a Volunteer Park Ranger of the
Ridgeway Parks Service.
JURISDICTION
1. Article V, Section IV of the Ridgeway State Constitution empowers this Court to hear
“all civil or criminal cases or controversies”.
ALLEGATIONS
On or about the date of 11 April 2022;
1. Plaintiff was peacefully and civilly conducting his business as a citizen of the State of
Ridgeway.
2. While standing outside near the Palmer Police Department station, Plaintiff was shot at
by Mr. OfficerOriginal, a Tourist in the State of Ridgeway.
3. Plaintiff, in self-defense, shoots back, and along with nearby law enforcement officers,
causes the death of Mr. OfficerOriginal.
4. After Mr. OfficerOriginal is killed, Plaintiff reloads his pistol facing away from any
nearby persons to replenish the bullets he shot at Mr. OfficerOriginal.
5. While reloading his pistol, Plaintiff is shot in the back by Defendant several seconds after
the shooting has stopped.
6. A nearby witness to the situation, Mr. Marces_RBLX, a Park Ranger Grade I in the
Ridgeway Parks Service, comments “wrong person” in response to Defendant’s actions.
7. After Mr. Marces_RBLX explains to Defendant that he shot the wrong person, Defendant
says “he was?” “well then” “that puts things into perspective”, realizing his error in
shooting and killing Defendant and admitting to his mistake.
On or about the date of 19 April 2022;
8. Plaintiff submitted a complaint to the Ridgeway Parks Service Internal Affairs against
Defendant
9. During the investigation, both Plaintiff and Defendant were interviewed by Ridgeway
Parks Service Internal Affairs, as found in Exhibit C and Exhibit D.
On or about the date of 30 April 2022;
10. The Ridgeway Parks Service Internal Affairs finds Defendant in violation of both the use
of force policy and jurisdiction policy.
11. The defendant is recommended to be issued a 3-day suspension and verbal warning.
TORTS IN QUESTION
1. 1 R. Stat. § 209 - Wrongful Death
PRAYERS FOR RELIEF
1. Plaintiff prays the Court finds Defendant liable for the aforementioned torts.
2. Plaintiff seeks monetary relief amounting to $3,000 in both redress and punitive damages
and $625 in compensatory damages.
a. $2,500 for 1 R. Stat. § 209 - Wrongful Death
b. $143 for the loss of Plaintiff’s Salvo Snub pistol
c. $70 for the loss of Plaintiff’s 2 boxes of 9mm ammunition
d. $287 for Plaintiff’s pain and suffering and related costs of replacing Plaintiff’s
possessions lost as a result of Defendant’s actions
e. $625 for the Plaintiff’s legal fees, which includes both the filing fee and hiring of
legal counsel.
3. Plaintiff also seeks any additional relief as deemed appropriate by the Court that is not
requested herein.
EVIDENCE
1. Exhibit A - Defendant shooting and killing Plaintiff during the situation in question.
2. Exhibit B - RPS Internal Affairs Report (Case#1-22-0089-RPS)
3. Exhibit C - Defendant’s testimony to RPS Internal Affairs
4. Exhibit D - Plaintiff’s testimony to RPS Internal Affairs
5. Witnesses will be presented during the discovery phase.
Date: 05/02/22
/s/OfficerVideoGame
Attorney for Plaintiff
Mytrius & Associates
Counsel of Record
/s/HolyRomanRyan
Attorney for Plaintiff
Mytrius & Associates
