Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
2,534 characters extracted
—
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
BETATHEWOLFGAMER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-315
Plaintiff
v.
BRENTABOY
Defendant
MOTION TO DISMISS
I. PLAINTIFF FAILED TO ADHERE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
The defense, upon receiving no evidence provided in the Civil Complaint, filed a motion for discovery
to the court on May 5th, 2022. This motion asked for the plaintiff to provide “Any screenshots, video, or other
graphics that may depict or support the Plaintiff’s allegations found within the Civil Complaint,” as well as
“Any other exhibits that may support the Plaintiff’s argument.”
This motion was placed onto the official Trello card by the clerk of the court on May 6th, 2022, at
roughly 7 AM U.S. Mountain Daylight Time. The plaintiff, as of the writing of this motion, has failed to
provide any evidence to support his allegations found within the Civil Complaint.
II. AN INEXCUSABLE AMOUNT OF TIME HAS PASSED
As of the time of the writing and filing of this motion to dismiss, the very motion for discovery has been
placed on the Trello card for roughly 82 hours, and no discovery has been provided from the plaintiff to the
defense. It is simply unfair to expect the trial to continue without the evidence. 82 hours is just an egregiously
long time to wait for a few simple links and names to be provided.
The court is now asking for a plea, and without access to the discovery, the defense is in no shape ready
to make a plea. The entire point of discovery is to prevent a trial at ambush. Should the defense make a plea
before it is allowed to see the discovery, it would be a miscarriage of justice and would infringe upon the
defendant's due process rights.
III. A MOTION TO DISMISS IS THE ONLY EQUITABLE REMEDY
Due to the inherent nature of the violation of rights committed by the plaintiff, the defendant has lost his
due process. The plaintiff had ample time to provide discovery and did not. How is it fair to expect a defendant
to plea when he is given no access to the evidence and witnesses slotted to testify against him? The only remedy
that can make this fair is by the court granting our motion to dismiss, and dismissing this case with prejudice.
The plaintiff is violating one of the most important and well-known rights provided by the Constitution.
A mistake of that accord can only be solved by not allowing it to continue. This case must be dismissed.
By and through the Defendant’s counsel,
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ OfficerVideoGame
OfficerVideoGame, RSB#17124
/s/ Commander1567
Commander1567, RSB#17131
Document record
File size
101.2 KB
Uploaded
Apr 29, 2022 12:00 PM
Filed
Apr 29, 2022 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
betathewolfgamer
Notes
Motion_to_Dismiss_BetaTheWolfGamer_v._Brentaboy.pdf — archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/keS1ztbR)
