Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,148 characters extracted
—
Citation: RSC-CV-309 Date: 2022-04-30
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
SubtractFunds
Plaintif,
v.
MedinaLuv
Defendant.
RULING ON WRIT FOR HABEAS CORPUS
BY THE
HONOURABLE JUDGE DANNLABS
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Techiey
Counsel for the Defendant: Turntable5000, DOJ.
Place of Hearing: N/A
Date of Hearing: N/A
Date of Judgement: April 30th, 2022
IN THE CASE OF SUBTRACTFUNDS V MEDINALUV
For the writ of habeas corpus, it will be denied.
PETITIONER DID INFACT ACT OUTSIDE OF THE LAW
When it comes to self defence laws, they can sometimes be tricky to skirt around as to not set a bad precedent for
future cases, but when it comes to this case inparticular, the law is very clear on an “active threat”.
When icyslider turned around and started to retreat, he was no longer an active threat, and the petitioner had
defended himself. yet the petitioner reloaded, then shot him again, acting outside of his defence, and rather now on
the offense, making the charge of Second Degree Murder accurate and in line with the standards at hand.
For this reason, the writ of habeas corpus will not be granted.
It is so ordered,
/s/ Dannlabs
Document record
File size
129.3 KB
Uploaded
Apr 28, 2022 12:00 PM
Filed
Apr 28, 2022 12:00 PM
Filing code
COMPLAINT
Uploaded by
subtractfunds
Notes
Archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/6qC4cdO9)
