STATE OF RIDGEWAY
LX1NAS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL COMPLAINT
DOCKET NO. RSC-CV-270
Plaintiff
v.
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
Defendant
The aforementioned plaintiff, on behalf of himself, by and through his Attorneys, alleges the following:
INTRODUCTION
1. The plaintiff is seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the State of Ridgeway
from enforcing the Wildlife Conservation Act Section 3(b).
2. Plaintiff seeks further relief by striking Section(b) of the act as unconstitutional.
PARTIES
1. The Parks and Wildlife Officer was acting in his official capacity as an agent for the State of
Ridgeway, therefore, representing the State.
2. Mr. Lx1nas, the Plaintiff, is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway.
JURISDICTION
1. Whereas this is a civil case, the Superior Court of Ridgeway has original jurisdiction to hear this
case under Article IV Section IV of the Ridgeway State Constitution.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. The Wildlife Conservation Act was part of the inaugural laws of the State of Ridgeway, passed
on Monday 21st of March 2021, with the establishment of the State Government.
2. Plaintiff, Mr. Lx1nas, was stopped by the Ridgeway Parks Service on Sunday 10th of April,
2021 at approximately 1:53 PM (GMT +3).
3. Ranger AdamAxer33 asked Plaintiff to exit the vehicle in search of a “tail” per the Wildlife
Conservation Act’s wildlife clause.
4. Upon obeying the Ranger’s orders, Plaintiff was arrested by the Ranger for possessing a firearm
as “wildlife”.
CAUSE OF ACTION
1. The Wildlife Conservation Act Section III(b) states an “animal” is any person who wears a fake
tail or cat ears, without detailing any further purposes.
a. A person (one (such as a human being, a partnership, or a corporation) that is recognized
by law as the subject of rights and duties)) is given the legal status of an animal (less
advanced in the scale of evolutionary development as distinguished from human beings).
2. The statement made by the Act’s Section III(b) deprives individuals of dressing as other beings
with a tail or cat ears under the threat of stripping their individual, inherent rights as citizens of
the State of Ridgeway from them.
3. This Act is a complete violation of the Ridgeway Constitution’s Bill of Rights Section V; “That
every member of society hath a right to be protected in the enjoyment of life, liberty, and
property”; as it not only obliterates the chance of individuals to enjoy their property, in this case,
the right of legally owning weapons but also their right to live as rightful citizens of the State of
Ridgeway.
4. Furthermore, the Wildlife Conservation Act Section III(b) is unconstitutional as it criminalizes
certain clothing, preventing the individuals wearing it from enjoying certain rights.
a. This clause is a blatant disregard of the First Amendment of the United States
Constitution; Plaintiff Lx1nas is a citizen of the United States of America and the State of
Ridgeway, is entitled to freedom of speech which is being violated by the deprivation of
his rights due to said clause. In the matter of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent
Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), in a way, instilled that freedom of
speech protects clothing whereas, in Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), the United
States Supreme Court stated that free speech can be restricted only under severe
circumstances beyond offensiveness.
5. The aforementioned arguments demonstrate that the Wildlife Conservation Act Section III(b)
violates free speech, as, without regard to offensiveness or disruption, prohibits certain
individuals from enjoying their rights as lawful citizens of the State of Ridgeway.
RELIEF
1. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief on the basis that the Wildlife Conservation Act Section III(b) is
unconstitutional.
2. Plaintiff seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the State of Ridgeway, and by
and through him the entire State as a whole, including law enforcement officers, from enforcing
said clause.
3. The immediate expunction of Plaintiff’s criminal record arising from violating the Wildlife
Conservation Act Section III(b).
Respectfully Submitted,
Plaintiff Lx1nas
By their Attorneys,
/s/ AZAD9L
Counsel of Record
RSB#11102
/s/ Mytrius
Counsel of Record
RSB#17106
