ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
State of Ridgeway
IN RE
SITEOWNER
Petitioner
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM
CLAIM NO. RSC-AD-266
ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM
CLAIM INFORMATION
Please complete the following fields to the best of your ability.
Agency: Ridgeway State Police
Type of Action ADMINISTRATIVE DEMERIT § 1.4
IA Reference No. 2-22-0016-C-RSP
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1) On or around March 30th 2022, PETITIONER caused the death of g_dsimply in the
course of his duties.
2) On or around March 30th, 2022, PETITIONER was actively UNDER ATTACK, and
besieged by a criminal organization known as the “Gang Disciples Killers.”
3) The besiegement was so intense that no reasonable civilian or innocent person would be
drawn to the area due to the rapid amount of gunfire.
4) The actions occurred at night under poorly lit conditions.
5) The color of G_dsimply at the time of occurrence was dark, and that it would be
extremely difficult to delineate whether a person was holding a weapon or not.
6) G_dsimply rushed the PETITIONER and ran towards him.
7) G_dsimply is a member of the Gang Disciples Killers.
8) When under oath for pains and penalties of perjury, G_dsimply intentionally and
deliberately omitted a material fact to the investigation.
9) The Internal Affairs of the Ridgeway State Police, negligently and without due regard for
the PETITIONER, failed to press on about g_dsimply’s gang allegiances.
10) The fact that G_dsimply is a member of the Gang Disciples Killers is materially relevant
because the decision by petitioner to discharge his service weapon was based upon
several contingent factors namely:
11) The Gang Disciples Killers are a criminal organization which is known for
AMBUSHING police officers, attacking civilians, causing chaos; attempting, or
conspiring or successfully holding government property by force and by barricading
themselves.
12) PETITIONER WAS KILLED several times by the GDK members during their assault on
the Sheriff’s Office substation before this action occurred.
13) PETITIONER knew that g_dsimply was a member of the Gang Disciples Killers.
14) PETITIONER is employed by the Ridgeway State Police in the Air Support Unit.
15) PETITIONER previously held no law enforcement employment for 6-8 months.
INTRODUCTION
This is the real world. As much as respondents may wish to argue their justification, they
make their claim unto the fact that Troopers and Law Enforcement Officers alike should be
perfect people. They should make no mistakes, they should not make split second judgment calls.
If they perceive a threat and have to make a decision in a short period of time they should just be
shot.
There is a real argument that is now being perpetrated upon most of the law enforcement
officers of the State of Ridgeway, where some are absolutely afraid to even use force because
they are so afraid of retribution being sought by the morally bankrupt, the ethically degenerate,
and the alternate accounts of cops. Historically, in the State of Ridgeway, the internal affairs
apparatus has poised itself to be the microphone and platform beloved by pests, frivolous
claimants, and malicious actors furthering their own wicked sense of retribution. This case is no
different, and it is why this case must serve to fight back against the cop baiters, the street-gang
members, and those who otherwise would not care about our system of government.
The irony of these proceedings is second to none. A criminal organization which
routinely butchers, executes, and ambushes police officers is now crying and demanding legal
retribution whereas they defy the law on a daily basis. “Gang Disciplines Complainers” is a more
fitting name for the band of not-so-merry delinquents.
ARGUMENT
Pursuant to APA § 1.4(c)(1), this demerit may be reviewed by a court of law if there is
clear and present factual error. Furthermore, pursuant to APA § 1.4(c)(2), an action may be
reviewed if it is clearly arbitrary. Arbitrary punishment is defined by the APA as “[...]
Punishment that takes no accounting of mitigating factors, circumstances, or liabilities[.]” See
APA § 1.8(a)(5).
The first clear and present factual error occurs when the internal affairs investigator failed
to press and seek an answer to his question as to whether g_dsimply was a member of the Gang
Disciples Killers. This fact is extremely important because the report does not address whether
he was specifically a part of the GDK organization or not, or any further investigation into that.
Furthermore, GDK was actively attempting to raid the Sheriff’s Office substation where the
petitioner was. The association of g_dsimply with GDK is an extremely big factor in this case as
it would provide cause for the use of force. This would not fall under any type of privilege, as
being a member of GDK is not a crime.
“[G]_dsimply declined to confirm if he was a part of GDK, but no evidence suggests that
this fact was clearly known during the incident.” See RSP IA Report 2-22-0016-C-RSP (Pg. 4,
pp 3) is another factual error. The entire case is contingent upon the fact that the shots were fired
due to the aforementioned circumstances AND the PETITIONER knew, within his mind, that
g_dsimply was beyond a reasonable doubt a member of GDK. This knowledge is gained from
PETITIONER’s work as District Attorney and dealing with the GDK organization for well over a
year.
The report from internal affairs leads you to believe that PETITIONER racially profiled,
used clothes to profile g_dsimply which is how he knew that g_dsimply was a member of GDK.
That is a clear factual error. “[I]t is clear at this time that [PETITIONER] made his decision to
shoot and kill g_dsimply based upon a stereotype of someone in such clothing to be affiliated
with a violent criminal organization such as the infamous GDK[.]” RSP IA Report
2-22-0016-C-RSP (Pg. 4, pp 3) The statement that the internal affairs are using against petitioner
is as follows “GDK was raiding SO sub as I said, and g_d simply is apart of GDK and looked
like GDK” Appendix A (0:04) This statement does not give any inclination that PETITIONER
profiled anyone, it is just the PETITIONER asserting the fact of the matter that g_dsimply WAS
AND IS apart of GDK, and at the time of the events looked like GDK. The fact that he looked
like GDK is an important part of this case. GDK dresses in mostly black clothing, for reasons
most likely to fulfill an illegal objective, but also it is extremely hard to see whether they were
holding a weapon because the weapon being black blends in extremely easily with their avatar.
The internal affairs makes no attempt to do a “reasonable person test” based on the facts
and circumstances of this case. The fact that no reasonable person test was undergone in a use of
force case, as according to Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) is reason enough alone to get
an action declared as arbitrary. They have taken no accounting of the mitigating factors which
would have justified these actions. These reviews must be taken in light of all facts and
circumstances confronting an officer without regard for any underlying intent or motivation Ibid.
There is no hindsight review. For the sake of the court, we will do a proper evaluation under the
totality of the circumstances.
- The Sheriff's Office substation was undergoing an all out assault by GDK.
- During the course of this assault, the petitioner was killed several times by GDK
members.
- With GDK persisting forward, the petitioner, fearing for his life and safety,
RETREATED to the lobby of the substation.
- During this state of retreat, g_dsimply rushed the lobby of the substation and
manually opened the door to enter it.
- Petitioner knowing that -;
- G_dsimply was a member of GDK,
- G_dsimply looked like a member of GDK,
- That no one from GDK would have a lawful reason to enter the substation,
and that they would not be attempting to do lawful business,
- Based a decision on -;
- The aforementioned,
- The fact that it was dark out,
- Petitioner thought that he was armed, and was actively taking out his
weapon,
- Only to the petitioner's dismay that g_dsimply was in fact unarmed.
The fact that the petitioner legitimately believed that g_dsimply was taking out a weapon, and the
aforementioned circumstances, it should be found that the actions of the petitioner were
objectively reasonable.
DEMAND FOR REMEDY
Petitioner prays that:
- The administrative court makes a finding that the action was ARBITRARY and
contained clear and present LEGAL ERROR.
- The administrative court OVERTURNS the action.
/s/ siteowner
Siteowner
Petitioner
/s/ breb 🙏
Brebbald
Emotional Support Counselor
Counsel for the Petitioner
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
A) Video Evidence (from g_dsimply)
B) siteowner Interview
C) g_dsimply Interview
D) IA Report
