Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
729 characters extracted
—
Citation: RSC-AD-257 Date: 2022-04-07
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
Matthewsandringham
Plaintif,
v.
Ridgeway Parks Service
Defendant.
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
BY THE
HONOURABLE JUDGE DANNLABS
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Pro Se
Counsel for the Defendant: N/A
Place of Hearing: N/A
Date of Hearing: N/A
Date of Judgement: 22-04-07
IN THE CASE OF MATTHEWSANDRINGHAM V R.P.S.
The plaintiff had mistakenly claimed that the parks service was in violation of Administrative Procedure Act Section
1.7. After realizing the mistake, the plaintiff then immediately rescinded the case via a motion to dismiss.
Finding no harm done, the court will dismiss this case without prejudice.
It is so ordered,
/s/ Dannlabs
Document record
File size
102.1 KB
Uploaded
Apr 7, 2022 12:00 PM
Filed
Apr 7, 2022 12:00 PM
Filing code
ADMINISTRATIVE_APPLICATION
Uploaded by
MatthewSandringham
Notes
Archived from the Trello docket (https://trello.com/c/t6ZjjV2S)
