Ridgeway Unified Courts

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF RIDGEWAY

Searchable full text

2,993 characters extracted

—

THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY RIDGEWAY COUNTY COURT Tomskipetski5, -against- LewisMedvedeva, In His Official and Personal Capacity as Chief of the Palmer Police Department Co-Defendant. & Palmer Police Department Co-Defendant. Case No. CCRC-CV-1308 (Case # Prior to Dismissal) APPEAL OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF’S CASE Presiding Judge: The Honorable Antradz APPEAL OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF’S CASE On 06/20/2021 the Honorable Judge Antradz of the Ridgeway County Court issued a ruling in the case CCRC-CV-1308 which resulted in the case being dismissed with prejudice. The counsel for the plaintiff in the case and the plaintiff himself both agree that the dismissal with prejudice was not an ideal judgement in this situation, and as such are seeking relief in the form of appeal. Counsel for the former plaintiff and the former plaintiff primarily wish to appeal the status of the dismissal. Counsel for the former plaintiff and the former plaintiff wish for the dismissal to be changed to be a dismissal without prejudice. The counsel for the former plaintiff and the former plaintiff continue to believe that the termination of employment which resulted in the initial case was unlawful and justified a lawsuit. There are several issues to be raised upon appeal. First of all counsel and former plaintiff seek to contest the assertion made by the former defendant’s counsel (for information purposes the former defendant is being represented by the District Attorney’s Office) that the former plaintiff’s case did not meet the Iqbal/Twombly Standard. Counsel and former plaintiff contest this claim made by the counsel of the former defendant. Counsel and former plaintiff also are concerned that the judge may have potentially felt compelled to act due to pressure from members of PPD command. For example, after the judge ruled to dismiss the case, a member of the PPD command left a message implying that the judge had ruled in the manner in which this command member had wanted. This is not to say that the judge is corrupt, but rather that conditions existed that could have potentially influenced the judge’s thinking, and in the interest of justice such a possibility must be considered. The counsel and former plaintiff wish to have the order to dismiss the case with prejudice be changed to a dismissal without prejudice, which would allow for future legal action on the matter. Counsel and plaintiff do admit that some mistakes were made in filing, however there still exist strong grounds for legal action on this matter and as such dismissal with prejudice will prevent justice from being served in this case. Ruling Being Appealed: https://trello-attachments.s3.amazonaws.com/605cd9cba7a5f357b5858b89/60c938346b798b8f71 bd867d/a38ef647a02974fe621641000a88db77/CCRC-CV-1308_MTDWP_Ruling.pdf Proof of Service: https://imgur.com/a/6svdMJn DATED: June 20th, 2021 Respectfully submitted, jedistormtrooper0625, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiff /s/ jedistormtrooper0625

1347_Notice.pdf

Original document

Searchable full text

Document record