IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY PARKS SERVICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-0750
EXHIBITS
INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO AMENDED CIVIL COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Halo4asin respectfully submits the following exhibits in support of the Amended Civil
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages. Each exhibit is a true and correct
copy of the record it reproduces.
Exhibit A. Ridgeway Parks Service Application Tracker - Ranger Class 22, Entry No. 26 (two
captures). Reflects Plaintiff’s entries: LETC CERT - “Yes”; PRIMARY SCREENING -
“Passed”; APPLICATION - “Passed”; FINAL SCREENING - “Failed”; OUTCOME - “Failed.”
Exhibit B. 4 R. Stat. § 122.402 (Basis for Background Investigation), as published in the 2026
Ridgeway Code of Statutes, with subsection (f) highlighted. Establishes the closed list of
permissible background-investigation criteria.
Exhibit C. Ridgeway County Fire Department Personnel Information Roster - Plaintiff’s entry
(two captures). Reflects Plaintiff’s discipline record as “Clean Record,” with the sole remaining
activity warning inactive and marked appealed.
Exhibit D. Statement of the Superintendent of the Parks Service (June 25, 2026). Confirms the
denial rested on a finding, at the time of reviewing Plaintiff’s background check, that Plaintiff
“had an activity strike within RCFD.”
1
Exhibit E. Written affirmations of the General Counsel of the Ridgeway County Fire
Department (June 29-30, 2026), affirming in his official capacity that: (1) the June 8, 2026
warning was issued by clerical error and has been removed from Plaintiff’s discipline record; (2)
both warnings are appealed and inactive under Handbook Policy 605-3; and (3) no adverse
action currently stands against Plaintiff. Two captures.
Exhibit F. Ridgeway County Fire Department Internal Review Board ticket record and transcript
(Ticket ID 72; opened June 15, 2026, closed June 16, 2026), establishing that the first warning
was appealed on June 15, 2026, identified by the Deputy Chief as “just a clerical issue” on June
16, 2026, and processed the same day. Typed transcript with two source captures.
2
EXHIBIT A
Ridgeway Parks Service Application Tracker
Ranger Class 22 - Entry No. 26 (Halo4asin). Two captures.
3
4
EXHIBIT B
4 R. Stat. § 122.402 - Basis for Background Investigation
2026 Ridgeway Code of Statutes, Title IV, with subsection (f) highlighted.
5
6
EXHIBIT C
RCFD Personnel Information Roster - Plaintiff’s Entry
Discipline record reflected as “Clean Record”; remaining activity warning inactive and marked
appealed. Two captures.
7
8
EXHIBIT D
Statement of the Superintendent of the Parks Service
Direct-message statement of June 25, 2026, confirming the basis for the negative background
result.
9
10
EXHIBIT E
Written Affirmation of RCFD General Counsel
Official-capacity affirmation of June 29, 2026, and removal confirmation of June 30, 2026. Two
captures.
11
12
EXHIBIT F
RCFD Internal Review Board - Ticket ID 72
Ticket record and transcript (opened June 15, 2026; closed June 16, 2026), with source captures
from the ticket system.
13
Ticket Record.
Ticket ID: 72
Opened By: @lrv (Plaintiff)
Open Time: June 15, 2026, 2:18 PM
Closed By: @Storm (Lieutenant axcurxd / trace_420)
Closure Date: June 16, 2026, 7:53 AM
Stated Reason for Closure: “Resolved, activity appealed, warning I is applied.”
Transcript (verbatim, as exported from the ticket system).
Tickets v2 (BOT) - June 15, 2026, 2:18 PM
Internal Review Board intake. Roblox Username: Halo4asin. Direct Supervisor: axcurxd.
Confirm you are appealing a activity warning: I agree. Have you completed the requirements?
Yes. Additional Information: “After submitting I can attach evidence, but it appears that the log
submitted on 6/7 wasn’t showing as completed through the bot when logs were checked on 6/8. I
was then issued an activity warning, even though again, the day prior, one was submitted.”
flimzee (Plaintiff) - June 15, 2026, 2:18-2:19 PM
[Attached two evidence images: IMG_1393.png; IMG_1472.png - ridgelog submission
records.]
flimzee (Plaintiff) - June 15, 2026, 2:20 PM
cc: [direct supervisor]
trace_420 (Lieutnenat axcurxd) - June 15, 2026, 2:34 PM
“Will look into once home.”
smellycnuggies (Deputy Chief) - June 16, 2026, 12:44 AM
“This was just a clerical issue, since the bot didn’t show you completed it in the cycle
report embed. Should be appealed/nullified.”
trooper_novich (Fire Chief) - June 16, 2026, 1:49 AM
Cc [direct supervisor]
trace_420 (Lieutnenat axcurxd) - June 16, 2026, 6:11 AM
“Activity appealed, logging now.”
trace_420 (Lieutnenat axcurxd) - June 16, 2026, 6:16 AM
“Logged, [Plaintiff] good to close?”
14
flimzee (Plaintiff) - June 16, 2026, 7:53 AM
“Thanks, you can close”
Source captures (ticket-system transcript view).
15
The foregoing establishes: (1) Plaintiff appealed the first activity warning on June 15, 2026 - the
same day the second warning issued and at the earliest opportunity; (2) the Deputy Chief of
RCFD identified the warning as “just a clerical issue” attributable to the department’s logging
bot on June 16, 2026; and (3) the appeal was processed and logged on June 16, 2026. Each of
these events preceded the Defendant’s background review and its June 29, 2026 publication of
the Ranger Class 22 results.
16
I certify that each exhibit above is a true and correct copy of the record it reproduces.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
/s/ Halo4asin
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Ridgeway State Bar License No. 18110
17
