IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE;
ERRCORE, in his official capacity as
Captain, Criminal Investigations
Division;
AZAP634, in his official capacity as
Lieutenant, Criminal Investigations
Division,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-5191
Presiding Judge: Hon. Arthur_Chen
PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT LIST
Plaintiff, Halo4asin, appearing pro se, submits the following list of exhibits in support of his
Final Amended Complaint and his Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff reserves the right
to supplement or amend this list as discovery proceeds.
The exhibits identified below are compiled in the Plaintiff’s exhibit repository, which is
accessible to the Court and the parties at the following link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LWPP2b78q2rV9daR1wemAoFhpBCoycvO?usp=sharin
g. The documents in that repository are true and correct copies of the originals, and Plaintiff filed
and served copies of the same concurrently with this Exhibit List. Plaintiff will preserve the
originals and maintain the repository in unaltered form for the duration of this action.
Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement or amend this list as discovery proceeds.
EXHIBIT A - Law Enforcement Training Center certification roster reflecting Plaintiff’s peace
officer certification (Class 19).
EXHIBIT B - Ridgeway State Bar license roster reflecting Plaintiff’s membership in good
standing (License No. 18110).
EXHIBIT C - Law Enforcement Training Center community rank record reflecting Plaintiff’s
standing.
EXHIBIT D - Plaintiff’s complete RCSO application results tracker, reflecting the progression
Passed, Passed, Failed, Failed, Failed, finalized on or about May 29, 2026.
EXHIBIT E - Application tracker note reflecting the citation to “Section 3235(a)” (now codified
at 4 R. Stat. Section 122.402(a)) and attribution “LT Azap634, CID.”
EXHIBIT F - Communication from Defendant Azap634 admitting, “If we were informed, your
background check may not have been failed.”
EXHIBIT G - Communication from Defendant Azap634 admitting, “my personal knowledge of
you was not one of those factors that we assessed.”
EXHIBIT H - Communication from Defendant Azap634 stating, “all but about two factors were
deemed indicative for your account being alternative,” without identification of the factors.
EXHIBIT I - Communication reflecting Defendant Azap634’s denial of summary review of
Plaintiff’s MPI misconduct report, including the statements “you could also just be attempting to
frame spookdab” and “It’s your word against his.”
EXHIBIT J - Defendant Azap634’s badge-tracking request concerning Plaintiff’s account, dated
May 25, 2026, at 1:18 PM.
EXHIBIT K - Badge chart for Plaintiff’s account reflecting 287 badges and an accumulation
curve commencing in July 2025.
EXHIBIT L - Communication from Defendant errcore stating, “Yes because he approved of the
result from another CID detective.”
EXHIBIT M - Communication from Defendant errcore reflecting his self-described “third
review” of the screening result.
EXHIBIT N - Communication from Defendant errcore stating, “I will not respond to anything
further,” together with Defendant Azap634’s message to the Governor.
EXHIBIT O - Plaintiff’s retaliation notice transmitted to Sheriff Cephal.
EXHIBIT P - Plaintiff’s retaliation notice transmitted to Deputy Sheriff redawesomeoby.
EXHIBIT Q - Communication from Defendant errcore referencing “you, red, and cephal.”
EXHIBIT R - Platform termination records for Plaintiff’s prior accounts (49dz and Flimzee),
dated for review July 12, 2025.
EXHIBIT S - Correspondence with RDOT investigator Vaevilo reflecting the initial
alternate-account determination.
EXHIBIT T - Correspondence with RDOT investigator Vaevilo reflecting the overturn of that
determination.
EXHIBIT U - Government bar and Ridgeway State Police employment requirements.
EXHIBIT V - Communication from Defendant errcore stating, “it doesnt look like Azap even
did your bgc.”
EXHIBIT W - Correspondence with RDOT investigator Vaevilo reflecting the applicable code
citation.
EXHIBIT X - Correspondence with RDOT investigator Vaevilo stating that he would review the
matter when home.
EXHIBIT Y - Office of the State Auditor tipline transcript screenshots, Case No. PC-0019-0526.
EXHIBIT Z - Screenshot reflecting spoookdan’s unsolicited contact with Plaintiff concerning the
misconduct report.
EXHIBIT AA - Formal RDOT record reflecting: “Reversed and changed to a pass as the
individual sent proof and statements proving that they were not an alternative account.”
EXHIBIT BB - Office of the State Auditor materialized report, Case No. PC-0019-0526,
together with the transmittal message of State Auditor mellanchoIy.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
/s/ Halo4asin
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Ridgeway State Bar License No. 18110
