Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
2,197 characters extracted
—
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
JAMESGARDAI,
Plaintiff,
v.
XOLAZZ, in his individual and official
capacities as the Deputy Attorney
General of the Department of Justice;
CEPHALGPT, in his individual and
official capacities as the Sheriff of the
Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office,
Defendants.
Action No. RSC-CV-0853
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
Defendant CephalGPT (“Defendant”), in his individual capacity, by and through
the undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rid. R. Civ. P. 6(b), respectfully moves the court to
enlarge the time to file a responsive pleading to the operative complaint up to and
including April 16, 2026, and states as follows in support:
1. Defendant was served on April 8, 2026. Accordingly, a responsive pleading
is due on April 13, 2026.
2. The undersigned was retained earlier this weekend and has been
preoccupied with other matters, and thus has not yet had sufficient time to review the
record, prepare responses to pending pleadings, and confer with agency counsel to
prepare a response.
3. This is the first request by the defendant for an enlargement of time.
4. A proposed order is attached.
Dated: April 12, 2026
Palmer, Ridgeway Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Nicklaus_s
Nicklaus_s (Rid. Bar No. 10241)
NICKLAUS & ASSOCIATES LLP
1 Jackson Road
Palmer, Ridgeway 90025
(123) 456-7890
[email protected]
Attorney for Defendant
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
JAMESGARDAI,
Plaintiff,
v.
XOLAZZ, in his individual and official
capacities as the Deputy Attorney
General of the Department of Justice;
CEPHALGPT, in his individual and
official capacities as the Sheriff of the
Ridgeway County Sheriff’s Office,
Defendants.
Action No. RSC-CV-0853
[PROPOSED] ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of Defendant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time, and
good cause appearing, it is this __ of ________, 2026, by the Superior Court of Ridgeway
for Ridgway County:
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time is GRANTED;
and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant CephalGPT, in his
individual capacity, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to, and
including, April 16, 2026.
Superior Court Judge
