Opinion of the Court
xLaZerify v. StudsPerSecond; epidermisgupta69 v. iCitruzx (consolidated)
xLazerify, Plaintiff v. Studs Per Second, Defendant
Cite as: 1 Rid. 101 (2023)
- Docket No.:
- 22-17, 22-18
- Court below:
- - **Docket No.: 22-17
- Submitted:
- January 8, 2023
- Decided:
- January 30, 2023
- Author:
- Gorsuch
Disposition
Certified questions answered in the negative.
unanimous Court
Summary
On certificate (and certiorari) from the Superior Court of Ridgeway in two consolidated pro se pleading cases, the Court adopted the Twombly/Iqbal plausibility standard under Rid. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1) and 12(b)(5), held that neither xLaZerify's negligence-per-se complaint nor epidermisgupta69's official-misconduct complaint stated a claim, and held that insufficiently pleaded complaints may be dismissed with or without prejudice at the lower court's discretion.
Citing references (13)
Decisions and filings on the public record that cite this ruling.