IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
ASPENFUN,
Plaintiff,
v,
MASTERQV,
Defendant.
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Hon.
Docket Number:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. Mr. aspenfun is a prominent public servant among the many other employees of the State
of Ridgeway. Particularly, Mr. aspenfun is a dedicated member of the Department of
Transportation, and actively contributes to this community by working to clear obstructed
roadways, provide transportation to players, and be of general assistance to other people.
2. As a result of Mr. aspenfun’s hard work in his community, he has impounded hundreds of
vehicles. Unfortunately, this has led some residents to hold a grudge against Mr.
aspenfun, rather than the laws of Ridgeway.
3. Mr. aspenfun often faces targeted attacks against him by specific individuals.
4. During one of his shifts, Mr. aspenfun was attacked by the Defendant, who approached
him and told him that “rawequals sends his regards.”
——————————————————————————————————————————————
CIVIL COMPLAINT
- 1 -
5. To challenge the actions of the Defendant, Mr. aspenfun brings this claim against them
for the purposes of seeking punitive and compensatory relief, or other relief where it is
deemed just and proper.
THE PARTIES
6. Plaintiff aspenfun is a resident and citizen of the State of Ridgeway. Plaintiff is suing in
their individual capacity for events that occurred while they were on-duty as an employee
of the Ridgeway Department of Transportation.
7. Defendant masterqv is a resident and citizen of the State of Ridgeway. Defendant is sued
in their individual capacity as such.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
8. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Ridgeway Const.
art. V, § IV because the claims arise under the Constitution and laws of the State of
Ridgeway.
9. Venue is appropriate in this judicial district pursuant to 7 R. Stat. § 131.001 because
Defendant resides in the single judicial jurisdiction of this State, and a substantial part of
the events or omissions giving rise to Mr. aspenfun’s claims occurred in this State.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
10. On July 12, 2026, Mr. aspenfun was on-duty as a uniformed tow operator with the
Ridgeway Department of Transportation. He was parked stationary on the road in front of
the Palmer Police department in Palmer City, actively towing a vehicle.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
CIVIL COMPLAINT
- 2 -
11. At some point, the Defendant, driving a vehicle, drove up beside Mr. aspenfun’s tow
truck on the wrong side of the road, and told him that “rawequals seends his regards
mate”. Mr. aspenfun said “cool” and walked away to return to his work.
12. A few moments later, the Defendant got out of their car and ran towards Mr. aspenfun.
The Defendant climbed on top of Mr. aspenfun’s tow truck, and pulled out a Solami
machine gun.
13. The Defendant pointed this firearm at Mr. aspenfun, and began to discharge it at him. Mr.
aspenfun responded in self-defence by attempting to run away, while returning fire with
his own firearm.
14. Mr. aspenfun tried to defend himself from the Defendant, who continued to shoot him
while chasing him further into the street. Mr. aspenfun jumped repeatedly while shooting
towards the Defendant. At some point, Mr. aspenfun had been shot so many times he was
killed.
15. The Defendant got into the passenger seat of a different car, who drove them away from
the area.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
CIVIL COMPLAINT
- 3 -
CAUSES OF ACTION
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
7 R. Stat. § 121.001
(Assault)
16. Mr. aspenfun incorporates the preceding paragraphs by reference as if fully set forth
herein.
17. Under 7 R. Stat. § 121.001, any person who intentionally and voluntarily causes
reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact is assault.
18. Defendant intentionally and voluntarily pointed a gun they knew was loaded in the
direction of Plaintiff.
19. Defendant discharged this firearm repeatedly in the direction of Plaintiff without any
justification to do so.
20. Defendant’s actions caused Mr. aspenfun to reasonably believe he would be immediately
harmed, and as a response, attempted to run and jump away from the Defendant. Thus,
Defendant has intentionally and voluntarily caused Mr. aspenfun reasonable apprehension
of imminent harmful contact.
21. Any reasonable person under similar circumstances would have experienced
apprehension of imminent harmful contact when a loaded firearm is pointed and
discharged at them.
22. Defendant’s conduct constituted assault under 7 R. Stat. § 121.001.
23. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s assaultive conduct, Mr. aspenfun suffered
bodily injury and death.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
CIVIL COMPLAINT
- 4 -
24. As such, Mr. aspenfun is entitled to punitive damages.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
7 R. Stat. § 121.002
(Battery)
25. Mr. aspenfun incorporates the preceding paragraphs by reference as if fully set forth
herein.
26. Under 7 R. Stat. § 121.002, any person who brings unconsented harmful or offensive
contact against another person is battery.
27. Defendant intentionally made harmful physical contact with Mr. aspenfun by repeatedly
shooting him with a Solami machinegun.
28. The contact was unconsented, offensive, harmful, and unlawful because Defendant never
spoke to Mr. aspenfun to gain prior consent, and approached Mr. aspenfun with a loaded
gun in hand. By firing repeatedly in Mr. aspenfun’s direction, Defendant did cause
Plaintiff to sustain serious bodily injuries and death, without lawful justification.
29. Defendant’s actions constituted battery under 7 R. Stat. § 121.002.
30. As a direct result of Defendant’s conduct, Mr. aspenfun suffered serious bodily injuries
and death.
31. As such, Mr. aspenfun is entitled to punitive damages.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
7 R. Stat. § 121.004
(Wrongful Death)
——————————————————————————————————————————————
CIVIL COMPLAINT
- 5 -
32. Mr. aspenfun incorporates the preceding paragraphs by reference as if fully set forth
herein.
33. Under 7 R. Stat. § 121.004, any person who causes the death of another without legal
cause or justification commits wrongful death.
34. Defendant is the sole causation as to Plaintiff’s death.
35. Defendant intentionally caused Plaintiff’s death by repeatedly shooting them with a
Solami firearm, while chasing them in the street.
36. At all times relevant, Plaintiff was a uniformed civil servant and was not engaging in any
provocative or violent behaviour, and was not a threat to himself or others that would
have otherwise justified Defendant’s conduct.
37. Defendant’s actions constituted battery under 7 R. Stat. § 121.004.
38. As a direct result of Defendant’s conduct, Mr. aspenfun suffered death.
39. As such, Mr. aspenfun is entitled to punitive damages.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
40. WHEREFORE, Mr. aspenfun respectfully requests the following relief:
a. An award of $4,000 in punitive damages for assault;
b. An award of $5,000 in punitive damages for battery;
c. An award of $15,000 in punitive damages for wrongful death; and,
d. Grant any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: July 14, 2026
——————————————————————————————————————————————
CIVIL COMPLAINT
- 6 -
Respectfully submitted,
——————————————————————————————————————————————
CIVIL COMPLAINT
- 7 -
