IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
IAMONCANE,
Petitioner,
v,
ROKUTITANITE, in his official capacity as a
Ridgeway State Trooper.
Respondent.
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS
Docket Number: RSC-CV-XXXX
The Petitioner, Mr. IamOncane, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby petitions
this Honorable Court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and shows unto the Court as follows:
PARTIES
1. IAMONCANE (hereinafter “Petitoner”) is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway.
2. ROKUTITANITE (hereinafter “Respondent”) is a citizen of the State of Ridgeway, and a
probationary trooper in the Ridgeway State Police. He is sued in his official capacity.
JURISIDICTION AND VENUE
3. This court has subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section IV of the
Ridgeway State Constitution, which empowers this Court to hear “all civil or criminal
cases or controversies.” Further, 7 R. Stat. § 133.001, et seq. empowers this Court to hear
this controversy as it is a writ for habeas corpus.
4. Venue is proper in this Court as the incident took place within the State of Ridgeway.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
- 1 -
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5. On June 29, 2026, Petitioner was present at the Palmer County Courthouse when a
shooting occurred.
6. Following that incident, Respondent, a uniformed peace officer, placed Petitioner in
handcuffs and escorted him through the courtroom toward the booking area.
7. While escorting Petitioner, Respondent passed directly by Honorable
xXBoomblast339Xx, who was visibly available as they were wearing official court robes,
on the State Judge team, and did not otherwise appear to be busy with another matter.
Honorable xXBoomblast339Xx stood in front of the bench.
8. At not point did the courtroom appear to be occupied by any active proceeding. No
parties were seated before the Court, no hearing was underway, and the Judge appeared to
be immediately available to hear matters. In-fact, the Judge even announced his
availability shortly before this incident, telling everyone that the Court was available for
expungements, warrant applications, and any other matters.1
9. As Respondent escorted Petitioner away from the courtroom, Petitioner expressly
invoked a demand for a probable cause hearing, stating words to the effect of, “I want a
PC hearing.”
10. Respondent did not acknowledge Petitioner's request, did not stop to determine whether a
hearing could be conducted, and continued on with the arrest.
11. Respondent began conducting a search of Petitioner's person. During this search, and
again thereafter, Petitioner repeatedly renewed his demand for a probable cause hearing.
1 Screenshot 2026-06-30 161758.png
——————————————————————————————————————————————
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
- 2 -
12. Despite Petitioner's repeated requests, Respondent neither responded to nor addressed
those requests, and continued processing Petitioner for booking without making any
apparent effort to secure a hearing before the active Judge.
13. Throughout the entirety of the arrest and booking process, Respondent never advised
Petitioner of the offense or offenses for which Petitioner was being arrested. Petitioner
repeatedly sought clarification regarding both the basis for the arrest and the requested
probable cause hearing, but Respondent did not provide an explanation.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
I. RESPONDENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO INFORM PETITIONER OF HIS
RIGHTS, POST-ARREST.
14. As part of Ridgeway’s State law, when an accused has been arrested following an
in-game incident, they may be taken to a probable cause hearing before jail. 6 R. Stat. §
131.204.
15. This particular law, which covers probable cause hearings, lays out a very fundamental
and basic framework for how Ridgeway treats in-game probable cause hearing.
16. 6 R. Stat. § 131.204 provides only two requirements to satisfy the right of a probable
cause hearing, that is: (1) the accused is arrested in-game; and (2) a State Judge is
available and has jurisdiction over the matter. Here, Petitioner was arrested right at the
Palmer County Courthouse, and walked directly past an on-duty Judge, who was
available, because they were not actively engaged in any proceedings, and had advertised
their availability that day.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
- 3 -
17. Because Petitioner's arrest met the requirements for a probable cause hearing, the
Respondent is required BY LAW to, at the very least, inform Petitioner of his right to a
hearing. More specifically, 6 R. Stat. § 131.204(a) holds that an officer “SHALL” inform
an accused.
18. Clearly, Petitioner consented to the hearing, more than once, and therefore should have
been taken before the Judge. Under 6 R. Stat. § 131.204(b), when an accused consents to
a hearing, they shall not be held in custody for more than ten (10) minutes. Here,
Respondent instead chose to bypass Petitioner's basic rights, and book him into jail for
twenty-five (25) minutes. Not only did Respondent ignore the law, they violated
Petitioner's rights for holding him longer than he should have been.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner prays that this Court grant him relief as follows:
A. Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus;
B. Order that arrest No. 2026629fb849e2c8 for Section 3.03 - Attempted Murder be vacated;
and,
C. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Date: June 30, 2026
Respectfully submitted,
Detachment_Result
——————————————————————————————————————————————
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
- 4 -
[Detachment_Result] State Bar No.
11103
Counsel for the Petitoner
Public Defender
Office of Public Defenders
Annex Building, Palmer City
——————————————————————————————————————————————
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
- 5 -
