IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIDGEWAY
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff,
v.
RIDGEWAY COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE;
ERRCORE, in his official capacity;
AZAP634, in his official capacity,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. RSC-CV-5191
Presiding Judge: Hon. Arthur_Chen
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
(AMENDED)
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Halo4asin, appearing pro se, and moves this Court for an order
authorizing discovery and the issuance of subpoenas duces tecum, pursuant to Ridgeway Rules
of Civil Procedure, and the process authority of 7 R. Stat. Section 131.101. In support, Plaintiff
states as follows:
I. INTRODUCTION
This action turns on a documentary record. Plaintiff seeks production of the records that will
establish the absence of any reasoned, evidence-based, conflict-free basis for the denial of his
application, and that will identify the actual decision-makers and their communications.
II. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff requests that the Defendants produce the following within the time prescribed by the
Ridgeway Rules of Civil Procedure:
1. The complete background investigation file concerning Plaintiff’s application, including
all worksheets, notes, scoring, and determinations.
2. The identity of the Criminal Investigations Division detective who conducted and entered
the screening result on Plaintiff’s application.
3. A complete identification of each “factor” that was deemed indicative of Plaintiff being
an alternate account, as referenced by Defendant Azap634 in Exhibit H, and the evidence
relied upon for each.
4. All communications, in any form, among Defendants Azap634, errcore, the unnamed
detective, Sheriff Cephal, and Deputy Sheriff redawesomeoby concerning Plaintiff or his
application.
5. The badge-tracking report generated on Plaintiff’s account on May 25, 2026, together
with all metadata reflecting its author and time of generation (Exhibits J and K).
6. All written policies, procedures, rules, and standards governing RCSO background
investigations and applicant screening, including those promulgated under 4 R. Stat.
Section 122.402.
7. All records reflecting the review or reconsideration of Plaintiff’s application, including
errcore’s “third review.”
III. SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM TO NON-PARTY CUSTODIANS
Plaintiff requests that the Court issue subpoenas duces tecum commanding the production of the
following records, which run throughout the State pursuant to 7 R. Stat. Section 131.101:
1. To the Office of the State Auditor: the complete file in Case No. PC-0019-0526,
including the materialized report and all transmittal communications of State Auditor
mellanchoIy (Exhibits Y and BB).
2. To the Ridgeway Department of Transportation: all records concerning the
alternate-account determination made against Plaintiff and its reversal, including the
records associated with investigator Vaevilo (Exhibits S, T, W, X, and AA).
3. To the Military Police of the Ridgeway National Guard: the misconduct report filed by
Plaintiff concerning spookdan, and all records reflecting which persons accessed or were
notified of that report and the basis for any supervisory access (Exhibit Z).
IV. PRESERVATION DEMAND
Plaintiff demands that all persons in possession of the foregoing records preserve them and
refrain from any deletion, alteration, or destruction pending the resolution of this action.
V. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant this Motion and
authorize the discovery and subpoenas set forth above.
Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________
/s/ Halo4asin
HALO4ASIN
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Ridgeway State Bar License No. 18110
