Rendered from the court's authenticated repository
Searchable full text
1,904 characters extracted
—
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
STATE OF RIDGEWAY,
v.
IIKOALAXXS,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: RSC-CM-8602
BEFORE: Chief Judge Arthur_Chen
STATE’S SUPPLEMENTAL SENTENCING MEMORANDUM
The State of Ridgeway, by and through undersigned counsel, do provide to the Court on
its own volition a sentencing memorandum as such:
AGGRAVATING FACTORS AND SENTENCING RECOMMENDATION
The State finds the following aggravating factors useful in determining a proper sentence
that takes into account the totality of the matter:
1. Previous murder-related criminal activity1
2. Previous record for contempt of court (see footnote 1);
3. The Defendant’s behavior in the early stages of this proceeding was so improper that the
original trial judge issued a gag order (see App’x A, Fig A-1), which goes to show that
the Defendant is not primed for rehabilitation.
The State does not contest the imprisonment term, but it does contest probation being
issued due to the nature of the offenses and that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the
mitigating circumstances, with credit for time served.
1 While the Court considered the Defendant’s priors in its sentencing, it is useful to note the types of
offenses that the Defendant committed in those priors as it goes to show the character of the Defendant.
CONCLUSION
The State does request the opportunity to allow Trooper Oddhawaiifiveo to speak as to
the damage done, as the Court has taken the severity into account, however, it is important that
the Court take into account the true severity.
APPENDIX A
Figure A-1
Shows the Defendant using profanity in Court (4/17/2026 @ 11:59 PM EST) and receiving a
Gag Order by the original trial judge and being admonished
DATED: June 23, 2026 Respectfully submitted
/s/ iiCryptic_LawMD
iiCryptic_LawMD
First State Attorney
Ridgeway Department of Justice
Criminal Division
