THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
iiPhoenix_Builds,
-against-
Ridgeway Credit Union,
Defendant.
Case No.
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Presiding Judge:
iiPhoenix_Builds, proceeding with counsel hereby brings this civil action and for their
allegations against the Defendant, it is alleged as follows:
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. One June 20th, 2026, an Investigation was initiated against the Plaintiff regarding an
incident where an external law enforcement deputy issued an order that RCU leadership
explicitly conceded was not lawful.
2. Rather than dismissing this meritless complaint, RCU senior leadership weaponized the
administrative process to demote Plaintiff.
3. In response to these policy-breaking disciplinary threats, the Plaintiff exercised their legal
right to seek an amicable settlement and prepare an administrative abuse complaint under
1 R. Stat. § 3112.
4. Upon receiving notice of potential legal escalation, the Defendant abruptly and
dishonorably discharged the Plaintiff from their employment.
5. The Defendant justified this sudden termination by citing §8005 - Employee Retaliation
Protection of the Corporations Handbook, which purports to forbid employee from taking
legal actions against another employee for administrative actions.
6. The Defendant applied §8005 to insulate its senior leadership from accountability,
effectively executing a retaliatory termination to suppress the Plaintiff’s rights.
LEGAL ANALYSIS: DUE PROCESS & ILLEGALITY OF HANDBOOK § 8005
1. Retaliation for Exercising a Statutory Right: In Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas Co.,
260 Ind. 249 (1973), the precedent established that when an employee is terminated for
exercising a statutorily conferred right, the employer’s absolute right to discharge them is
strictly limited by the judiciary. In the instant case, 1 R. Stat. § 3112 explicitly grants
citizens to seek injunctive relief and punitive damages in court if an administrative
proceeding is handled frivolously. The Defendant’s handbook clause (§8005) directly
clashed with this statute by attempting to strip employees of a legislatively granted right.
2. Unlawful Restrictions on Access to the Courts: Employment provisions that act as an
absolute ban on judicial access or penalize a citizen for filing a lawsuit are void as a
matter of public policy. Under the Supreme Court’s analytical framework regarding
access to courts (e.g., Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co.), the right to sue and defend
in the courts is one of the highest privileges of citizenship. A private business cannot
construct an internal handbook rule to serve as an immunity shield against civil lawsuits
or to contractually extinguish statutory remedies.
3. Procedural Due Process: Due process dictates that a party must have proper notice and a
meaningful opportunity to defend themselves before severe adverse actions are finalized.
By utilizing §8005 to execute a summary, retaliatory termination without fair, impartial
hearings on the merits, the Defendant denied the Plaintiff basic procedural protections.
VENUE
1. Venue is proper in this Court because the Superior Court has the jurisdiction for all civil
cases under Article V, Section IV of the Constitution of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Venue is proper in this Court because the actions, corporate decisions, and administrative
proceedings giving rise to this claim occurred within the jurisdiction of the State of
Ridgeway, and the Defendant is a business operating within this state.
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff’s iiPhoenix_Buld is a citizen of the United States of America.
2. Defendant’s Ridgeway Credit Union (RCU) is a business entity operating within the State
of Ridgeway.
TORTS AND PRAYERS FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiff is suing the defendant for the following torts:
a. Abuse of Administrative Process (1 R. Stat. § 3122):
i. The Defendant facilitated, extended and sustained an administrative
proceeding that they knew was initiated by a groundless and unlawful
command from an external deputy. By attempting to issue a disciplinary
demotion after recognizing the total invalidity of the initial complaint, the
administrative process was abused as a pretextual tool to punish Plaintiff.
2. The Plaintiff requests that the relief for Tort 1 be as follows:
a. $5000.00 in ingame currency in punitive damages under 1 R. Stat. § 3112.
b. The plaintiff also requests that the Court issues Injunctive Relief ordering that the
Ridgeway Credit Union to immediately reverse the administrative leave, clear the
Plaintiff’s record of this improper investigation, and reverse any demotions and
discharges to the Plaintiff.
3. Any further relief this Court deems just and proper.
DATED: June 22nd, 2026
Respectfully submitted,
ClassicMika, Esq.
Attorney for the Plaintiff
/s/
__________________________
iiPhoenix_Builds
Plaintiff
/s/ ii_phoenix_builds
