Case. RSC-CM-8262 Document 2 Filed 05/07/2026 Page 1 of 3
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
STATE OF RIDGEWAY
Plaintiff(s)
v.
VOXPAA
Defendant(s)
Case No. RSC-CM-8262
ERRATA NOTICE - STATE'S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR
INSUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY
TO THE HONORABLE COURT
COMES NOW the State of Ridgeway, by and through its undersigned counsel, and
respectfully submits this Errata Notice to correct two clerical errors appearing in the State's
Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Specificity, filed in the
above-captioned matter.
The State identifies the following corrections:
1. The caption of the Opposition incorrectly reflects a filing date of May 2, 2026. The
correct filing date is May 7, 2026.
2. Section II(A) of the Opposition states that the Defendant's Motion "does not cite
Rule 4(a), analyze it, distinguish it, or acknowledge its existence anywhere in twelve
pages of briefing." The correct page count of the Defendant's Motion is three pages.
1
Case. RSC-CM-8262 Document 2 Filed 05/07/2026 Page 2 of 3
These corrections are clerical in nature and do not affect the substance, legal arguments, or
conclusions advanced in the Opposition in any respect. The State anticipates that the Defendant
may attempt to characterize these corrections as somehow prejudicial to his position or damaging to
the integrity of the State's filing. Any such argument would be without merit.
An errata notice is a well-recognized procedural mechanism for correcting typographical and
clerical errors in filed documents, and its filing reflects nothing more than the State's commitment to
an accurate record before this Court. The errors corrected herein, a transposed filing date and an
incorrect page count, are self-evidently clerical in nature. Neither correction alters a single legal
argument, modifies any factual allegation, changes the relief requested, or affects the Defendant's
ability to respond to the Opposition. See Ridgeway R. Crim. P. Rule 4(d), which recognizes that
technical and formal imperfections in charging documents are subject to correction without
prejudice to either party, a principle that applies with equal force to corrections of clerical errors in
motion practice. To the extent the Defendant argues prejudice, he bears the burden of
demonstrating that these ministerial corrections have in some concrete way impaired his ability to
litigate this matter, a burden he cannot meet.
The State respectfully requests that the Court accept this Errata Notice, note the corrections
to the record, and disregard any objection by the Defendant that lacks a substantive basis in law or
fact.
2
Case. RSC-CM-8262 Document 2 Filed 05/07/2026 Page 3 of 3
* * * * *
Dated: May 7, 2026
Palmer, Ridgeway
Respectfully Submitted,
luhvcouture
State Attorney
Office of Government & Corruption
Ridgeway Department of Justice
3
