THE STATE OF RIDGEWAY
RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
thr33six8,
Plaintiff
-against-
RichardLennox
Defendants.
RSC-CV-1373
CIVIL COMPLAINT
Presiding Judge: Arthur_Chen
thr33six8, proceeding without counsel, hereby brings this civil action against the
Defendant. It is alleged as follows:
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. On March 1st, 2026, Plaintiff thr33six8 was in Ridgeway.
2. Plaintiff was a tourist.
3. Plaintiff was driving in a green sedan.
4. Plaintiff had a Solami submachine gun slinged and a knife, which could not be seen.
5. While Plaintiff was driving, two tourists named renshire and zgta were armed with
Stetson M2-A automatic longguns and began a shootout against an ongoing scene by
Bloxmart.
6. Among the people in that shootout, there was Artyphos, who was on duty as a sheriff
deputy (not the rank) of the Ridgeway County Sheriff's Office.
7. Plaintiff found himself before an RCSO pickup truck that seemed to belong to Artyphos
during the shootout.
8. While Plaintiff was before that car, Artyphos, who had a Stetson M2-A and a Para 17
semi-automatic handgun, was using the car as cover for shooting at the two tourists, who
were still firing upon the deputy and others (excluding me).
9. During the shootout, people at the scene were picking up items that others had dropped
from dying.
10. Artyphos was shot and killed during the shootout.
11. I began to drive away from the scene after Artyphos was shot and killed.
12. Ridgeway County Transit Authority Supervisor aspenfun killed the tourists with a
Cardiac-5 SMG from afar.
13. aspenfun was the one who fired the last shot of the shootout.
14. When zgta was killed by aspenfun, Defendant RichardLennox drove to the scene.
15. While responding, Defendant was on duty as the Chief of Police for the Palmer Police
Department.
16. Defendant was driving a Pioneer muscle car that was from the Palmer Police Department.
17. Defendant was communicating with aspenfun after the shootout.
18. After the shootout, Plaintiff returned to the scene to pick up two boxes of .45 ACP bullets
that had dropped from Artyphos and got back in his green sedan.
19. A few seconds before that, Defendant began driving toward me.
20. Defendant got out of their Pioneer, unholstered their Cardiac-5, and began shooting at me
with the SMG.
21. Defendant reloaded their SMG two times.
22. While Defendant was shooting at me, a tourist named nugnoss and another tourist named
XG0489 were at the scene, and Defendant shot me to death while I was driving away.
23. Plaintiff respawned in Palmer.
24. Plaintiff sent a string of DMs to Defendant over Discord regarding what had just
happened.
25. Defendant wired $3,000 to Plaintiff.
VENUE
1. Venue is proper in this Court because the alleged actions took place in the State of
Ridgeway, which is subject to the laws of the State and County of Ridgeway.
2. This court has original jurisdiction for all civil cases and controversies pursuant to Article
V Section IV of the Ridgeway State Constitution.
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff is a resident of the State of Ridgeway.
2. Defendant is a resident of the State of Ridgeway as well as the Chief of Police of the
Palmer Police Department, which is a law enforcement agency that has jurisdiction in the
City of Palmer.
TORTS ALLEGED
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(1 R. Stat. § 3114 - Official Misconduct)
1. The statute cited above this paragraph states the following:
a. Any individual who is a public servant and commits an act relating to his office
but constitutes an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that
such act is unauthorized; or refrains from performing a duty which is imposed
upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.
2. According to 6 R. Stat. § 3108(a), one of the official functions of the Palmer Police
Department is to "patrol and conserve the peace of the municipality of Palmer and
Oakland Park in their jurisdiction at-large". This is a statute, and statutes are laws, so this
is a law.
3. A duty asks someone or some entity to do something.
4. This law asks the Palmer Police Department to conserve the peace (of the municipality of
Palmer and Oakland Park in their jurisdiction at-large).
5. Police officers are public servants.
6. Defendant was a police officer of the Palmer Police Department.
7. Police officers in the State of Ridgeway are certified by the Law Enforcement Training
Center and are taught additional policies by the law enforcement agency that employs
said police officers.
8. If bodily harm and killing is not peaceful, then a person who is a threat of lethal bodily
harm or death (i.e., killing) is not peaceful. Said person goes against the peace.
9. Therefore, a police officer of the Palmer Police Department shall do something to combat
such threats in order to conserve the peace.
10. I was not behaving such that a police officer could perceive me as a lethal threat.
11. If I were a lethal threat, I would be a threat to peace.
12. Since I was not a lethal threat, I was not a threat to the peace.
13. Therefore, by shooting me, Defendant killed someone of peace rather than conserving
peace.
14. Such is not an authorized act of (a police department's) office.
15. Either way, therefore, Defendant did commit this tort; Defendant was a public servant (1)
who (2) either committed an unauthorized act of their office or refrained from performing
a duty imposed to him by law.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(1 R. Stat § 3115 - Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law)
1. The cited statute says the following:
a. Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or
usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the State of Ridgeway or
other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to
the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for
redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or
omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be
granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was
unavailable.
2. Under the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, I have a right to be free from
deprivation of life.
3. Defendant's unauthorized act deprived me of my life.
4. Since the unauthorized act deprived me of my life, such act goes against my right to be
free from deprivation of life.
5. Since such right to be free from deprivation of right is a right afforded by the 14th
amendment, it violates the 14th amendment.
6. Since it violates the 14th amendment, Defendant's unauthorized act violated the 14th
amendment and Defendant violated the 14th amendment by extension.
7. Therefore, Defendant did commit this tort: Defendant (1) deprived me of a right secured
by constitutional/statutory law.
RELIEF REQUESTED
For Official Misconduct:
1. Pursuant to subsection ⅱ of 1 R. Stat. § 3114, I request that:
a. Defendant be declared liable of committing this tort
b. Defendant be declared liable for $5 of punitive damages
For Deprivation of Rights:
1. Pursuant to 1 R. Stat. § 3115, I request that:
a. Defendant be declared liable of committing this tort
DATED: March 3rd, 2026
Respectfully submitted,
———————————————
thr33six8
Plaintiff
/s/ thr33six8
