RIDGEWAY SUPERIOR COURT
FOR THE COUNTY OF RIDGEWAY
Detachment_Result,
Plaintiff,
v.
wateraero,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Detachment_Result (“Plaintiff”), by and through the undersigned counsel,
seeking all available relief, in their complaint against Defendant wateraero
(“Defendant”), alleges the following:
INTRODUCTION
1. On July 10th, 2025, Plaintiff had been walking around on the sidewalk,
interacting with other Ridgeway citizens.
2. Plaintiff had just recently ended their shift with RCU Corporate Security,
and had unknowingly left a company clipboard in their inventory. Plaintiff was unaware
of this clipboard being in their inventory until the incident began, where they equipped it.
3. When the Plaintiff had equipped the clipboard, the Defendant immediately
tasered the Plaintiff in the back, causing them to become immobilized. Defendant than
handcuffed Plaintiff.
4. Rather than justify why they tasered Plaintiff, Defendant asked Plaintiff
“why u got a clipboardf”
5. Plaintiff asked again, why the Defendant had tasered them. Plaintiff
responded with, “its an illegal item…trap”.
6. Defendant handed Plaintiff over to an RCSO deputy, who explained why
the clipboard had appeared in Defendant’s inventory, and later released them.
7. Plaintiff had unknowingly kept their company issued clipboard in their
inventory as they clocked off. Upon observing Plaintiff with a clipboard in their hand,
Defendant immediately tasered them and handcuffed them.
1
JURISDICTION
8. This court has original jurisdiction over “all civil and criminal cases or
controversies." Rid. Const. art. 5, § 4.
9. Venue is proper in this court because the actions and omissions alleged in
this complaint took place in the State of Ridgeway.
PARTIES
10. Detachment_Result (“Plaintiff”) is an individual, resident, and citizen of the
State of Ridgeway.
11. wateraero (“Defendant”) is an individual, resident, and citizen of the State
of Ridgeway. Defendant is a Captain with the Ridgeway National Guard. Defendant is
sued in their personal capacity.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
Battery - 1 R. Stat. § 3102
12. All prior paragraphs within this complaint are incorporated as if they were
fully set forth herein.
13. Defendant, acting without justification or consent, deployed a taser against
Plaintiff in a non-threatening situation, because they had a clipboard, thereby constituting
battery in violation of 1 R. Stat. § 3102.
RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the court enter judgment in their favor and
against Defendant as follows:
a. Declaring Defendant is liable for Battery;
b. Awarding compensatory damages to Plaintiff in an amount to be
determined at trial;
c. Awarding punitive damages to Plaintiff not to exceed the statutory limit;
d. Such further relief as the court deems just and proper.
Dated: July 10th, 2025 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Detachment_Result
Nicklaus_s (State Bar No. 11103)
2
